v0.17.0 mtls added to network chain, sinks, and sources

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-29 18:44:44 -04:00
parent 5fbd5c71cf
commit dd665bb339
26 changed files with 2293 additions and 488 deletions
+30 -6
View File
@@ -45,15 +45,29 @@ Chained entries carry a `node` label identifying where they originated.
Relays preserve `node`, so a label survives any number of hops and identifies
the original producer rather than the last relay.
Under mTLS the source can instead bind the label to the sender's certificate,
which overrides `trust_node` entirely:
| `auth.node_binding` | Connection label | Per-entry `node` field |
|---------------------|------------------|------------------------|
| `none` | `trust_node` governs | `trust_node` governs |
| `assert` | Must equal the certificate identity, or the peer is rejected | `trust_node` governs |
| `force` (default under `mtls`) | The certificate identity | Overwritten with the identity |
Pick `force` at an ingest boundary you do not trust — it is the only setting
where a compromised edge cannot mislabel its entries, including through the
per-entry `node` field. Pick `assert` on a relay-to-relay hop, where the relay
should prove its own identity but the origin labels it forwards must survive.
See [Security](security.md#node-binding).
Formatters render node identity as a syslog-style prefix on the source field:
`edge-01/app.log`. In JSON output the node therefore appears inside the source
field, not as a separate top-level key.
> `trust_node = true` means an authenticated peer can claim **any** node label,
> including one belonging to another host. On an untrusted network use
> `trust_node = false`, or read the
> [mTLS authentication plan](mtls-auth-plan.md), which proposes binding the
> label to the peer's certificate identity.
> `trust_node = true` with no `auth` block means any peer the CA vouches for can
> claim **any** node label, including one belonging to another host. On an
> untrusted network set `auth.type = "mtls"` with `node_binding = "force"`;
> `trust_node = false` is the fallback when certificates are not an option.
## Wire Protocol
@@ -150,6 +164,9 @@ enabled = true
ca_file = "/etc/logwisp/tls/ca.crt"
cert_file = "/etc/logwisp/tls/edge-01.crt"
key_file = "/etc/logwisp/tls/edge-01.key"
[pipelines.plugin_sinks.config.auth]
type = "mtls"
allow = ["relay.internal"] # pin the relay, not just its hostname
```
**Relay** — ingest, keep errors only, archive and stream:
@@ -172,13 +189,16 @@ type = "tcp_chain"
[pipelines.plugin_sources.config]
host = "0.0.0.0"
port = 15801
trust_node = true
[pipelines.plugin_sources.config.tls]
enabled = true
cert_file = "/etc/logwisp/tls/relay.crt"
key_file = "/etc/logwisp/tls/relay.key"
client_auth = true
client_ca_file = "/etc/logwisp/tls/ca.crt"
[pipelines.plugin_sources.config.auth]
type = "mtls"
allow = ["edge-01", "edge-02"]
node_binding = "force" # entries are labelled from the certificate
[[pipelines.plugin_sinks]]
id = "archive"
@@ -195,6 +215,10 @@ host = "127.0.0.1"
port = 8080
```
Entries arriving on this relay are labelled `edge-01` or `edge-02` because that
is what their certificates say, regardless of the `node` each edge configured.
`test/mtls-chain-test.sh` builds exactly this shape against a throwaway PKI.
## Operational Notes
- **Formatting is a relay decision.** Because chain links carry structured